One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
The question regarding influence of medicine progress on people has always been highly debatable in all the societies. It is argued that one of the main outcomes of medical care achievements is growth of life duration. Although, this provides a lot of benefits, I think that this also produces drawbacks that outweigh the former.
On the one hand, life span increasing affords additional time for a family. This means that grandparents could see not only growth of their grandsons and granddaughters, but also a birthday of a child of their grandchildren. Therefore, people could spend more hours with relatives and satisfy social needs. For example, according to a study of Russian Institute of Psychology conducted 5 years ago, the majority of dying men regret about insufficient time devoted to their family members. Thus, rising of life duration will solve this problem.
On the other hand, this opportunity is required huge amount of money. This is because our unpaid medicine includes only base options of health insurance. Therefore, if a person wants to get more additional variants of medical care using contemporary equipment and technologies, they have to visit private clinics and spend a lot of thousands of rubles. For instance, according to research of one of Moscow clinics made at the beginning of this year, there are almost 25% of residents of the capital preferred to use the services of private clinics. In other words, long life expectancy demands high quality that costs a lot of money.
Even thought, there are an opportunity to live longer and enjoy additional years of life, I think that it is available not for all individuals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85077995762 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5449091892 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2413564941 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756923510121 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518159288146 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144336203378 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456046376566 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.