Some people think schools should educate pupils according to their academic ability, and others believe pupils with different abilities should be educated together. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recent decades have witnessed considerable changes in education system. Nowadays, sorting and teaching students separately considering gap in their intellectual and leaning abilities is in debate. However, this argument looks good only on paper. This essay discusses both views and provides empirical evidences supporting above notion.
To begin with, selecting pupils according to learning abilities is not advisable for several reasons. To enumerate, it encourages psychological complexities among learners of the two groups. In other words, system of filtering students brings feeling of inferiority to those who are not in the group and superiority feeling to the selected ones. It is harmful for both in the long run. Moreover, students show inconsistency in academic performance, to illustrate, student scoring 60 to 70% may develop interest in the company of good ones and score 80 to 90% and vice versa. Thus, on separating children the chances of such transformation goes down, as teaching both groups together inspires the weaker to study like brilliant one.
On the paradoxical side, it is believed that separating students can boost up the maximum learning among the students and they can be improved too far than mixed class. Firstly, complex concepts taught differently relating to the learning ability can make pupils sharper and more capable. Secondly, in mixed classroom chances of intelligent students getting influenced by the spoiled one are more and this ruins their academic prospects. Consequently, shining students are more subjected to the risk of loss in studies in the company of disoriented students.
To summarize, this issue in the light of benefit of intelligent candidates, the argument may seem appropriate. However, its overall effect on the student community is likely to be more harmful because it may hurt self-esteem of learners and this cannot be permitted under any circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the company of disoriented students. To summarize, this issue in the light of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99655115856 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618243243243 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4696373921 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160392254377 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487824048157 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049495389037 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879007289066 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363953142634 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.