Some people think that schools should stop teaching students by using books because students find them boring and that children can learn from films TV video games and computer instead To what extent do you agree or disagree

In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that some human beings put their theory that educational institutes should not teach students by using books. Some people concur that students might find books uninteresting as they can get the same knowledge from watching movies. However, I quibble from them and propound that books can never replace new technologies.

Adequate evidence is obtainable to substantiate the concept of books should never be replace by gaining knowledge from tv or the internet. The top-notch concrete reason is children will forget the importance of books along with that few children might not watch educational movies. As a result, children will start watching violence tv shows or adult movies will impact in a negative way on their mind. Another rationale which hauls me to patron is by seating in front of laptop or Tv whole day to gain knowledge. Their body structure may get disturbed along with that their eye sight will become low and also they will become lazy. To uphold my notion. I would quote an instance of survey done by Australian school by putting few children to learn from books and other to learn from film and computer games. The result came and children who learnt from books were more active and the other group started doing irregular activities on computer.

What is half full to some, may appear half empty to others. So the public in general tend to distinguish that gaining knowledge from computer or films is necessary. Which has multifarious reasons. However, it’s true that if students learn from watching tv show or films they will learn more easily and also convenient. Withal they also uphold that in markets now there are lots of educational shows are available which is good for their mind and learn more because children are more interested in playing video games or watching shows.

In recapitulation, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting that books should never be replace with TV shows or video games. However, its contrary can be overlooked or controlled. Consequently I firmly disagree with given statement.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'be' and 'replace'.
Suggestion: be never replace
...ubstantiate the concept of books should never be replace by gaining knowledge from tv or the int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 371, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ce tv shows or adult movies will impact in a negative way on their mind. Another rationale which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 576, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...may get disturbed along with that their eye sight will become low and also they will beco...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 881, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o learnt from books were more active and the other group started doing irregular...
^^
Line 4, column 886, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnt from books were more active and the other group started doing irregular acti...
^^
Line 6, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ge from computer or films is necessary. Which has multifarious reasons. However, it’s...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 103, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'be' and 'replace'.
Suggestion: be never replace
...ng factors supporting that books should never be replace with TV shows or video games. However, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...ntrary can be overlooked or controlled. Consequently I firmly disagree with given statement....
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, may, so, in general, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0888252149 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61270605958 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547277936963 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0415332777 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4736842105 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309323663989 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832752699574 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634827834701 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182206139269 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623956070741 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.