There is an increasing number of people are concerned about whether to encourage children to be more competitive or not. Some state that rivalry competition is a necessary factor which encourages children to develop their physical and mental strength, whereas others argue children should be taught about the importance of teamwork to be more useful adults. This essay agrees with the former idea and will discuss both points of view.
With respect to physical and mental availability, some people believe that rivalry encouragement is a key factor to the development of kids. It is due to the fact that competition provides children the victorious desire which helps them to make use the most of their abilities including physical and mental strength to achieve success in the future. Additionally, providing competitive environment also stimulates their muscles and increase their flexible movements which help them survive in such harsh conditions. This phenomenon also paves the way for searching for talented people to strengthen a nation power. National Gifted Students Examination is a prime example, an annual important test which gives opportunities for government to search for talented students to enhance its international influence.
On the other hand, those opposed to this advocate that teaching students how to work together gains more benefits. It is true that working as a group enhances their capabilities of creation through sharing ideas and brainstorming. However, co-operating with lazy people could exert a bad influence on the other children and, therefore, reduces their ability to think properly. It is reported from World Health Organization in 2018 that 87% of students experience low reading literacy if there is at least a lazy member in their teams.
In conclusion, despite the fact of increasing children creativity, co-operation does exert harmful impacts on the other kids. Meanwhile, rivalry between children stimulates their muscles and brain cells to enhance their abilities to be an all-rounded person.
- Task 2 Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes of this problem Suggest solutions 78
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 42
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 78
- Nowadays many animal species are becoming extinct Some people believe that countries and individuals must solve this problem others believe that humans beings are more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, at least, in conclusion, it is true, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51746031746 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92798247616 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4627688063 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246734076281 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838436281924 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077310450968 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15965871661 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937123087181 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.