Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree

Several food items that we consume these days are scientifically proven to be ineffective and unhealthy. Foods so called fast foods are the main ones in this category. Despite their unhealthy characteristic they are widely consumed by modern day people. Some may argue that foods that are proven to be bad for health should be banned from shops. I completely agree with this statement and in this essay i will layout a few reasons why i think fast foods and other junk foods should not be allowed to be sold.

The main reason is that they are unhealthy. The foods so called fast foods are called junk foods is because of their nature. These food items are extremely ineffective and provide less nutrients compared regular and traditional meal that are served in most households. These are also the main cause for the increase in several diseases like obesity and heart failure. The high increase in obesity in recent years are fuelled by these soft drinks and fast foods. Although it is unlikely to get rid of all food items which are proven to be bad for health, we should regulate their outflow and implement some rules to protect public health.

On the other hand, some may counter argue and say that these food items should not banned and should be allowed to be sold. The main reason for their argument arise from the fact that these generate a lot of income. The amount of individuals who consume these fast foods are increasing on daily basis and people have less time to cook so they are forced into buying these junk foods. These help companies and shops who sell these food items and are able to generate a considerable amount of Income.

In conclusion, food items which are scientifically proven to be ineffective and unhealthy will not any good to people health other than damaging peoples health. Personally i believe these food items should be banned from shops and should be completely discarded for common good despite the fact that they generate a high revenue.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their unhealthy characteristic they are widely consumed by modern day people Som...
^^
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e with this statement and in this essay i will layout a few reasons why i think f...
^
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s essay i will layout a few reasons why i think fast foods and other junk foods s...
^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun nutrients is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s are extremely ineffective and provide less nutrients compared regular and traditio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'ban'
Suggestion: ban
...nd say that these food items should not banned and should be allowed to be sold The ma...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...than damaging peoples health Personally i believe these food items should be bann...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72093023256 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33781665139 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421511627907 0.561755894193 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 344.0 20.2975951904 1695% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1624.0 106.682146367 1522% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 344.0 20.7667163134 1656% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 60.0 7.06120827912 850% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399703751099 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.399703751099 0.084324248473 474% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289042873975 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962438931992 0.056905535591 169% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 172.8 13.0946893788 1320% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -269.22 50.2224549098 -536% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 136.3 11.3001002004 1206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.58 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.41 8.58950901804 273% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 139.6 10.1190380762 1380% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 140.0 10.7795591182 1299% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.