Some people think that smoking should be banned from all public places.
Do you agree or diasgree?
Ever since tobacco was cultivated the life expectancy of smokers is decreasing which makes them ponder about it. People who do not smoke want the Government to prohibit this habit from all the public places. I strongly agree with the statement and believe that smoking is destroying the health and leading to a loss in productivity.
Puffing the nicotine damages not only people who smoke, but also affects the non-smoking part of the society. One of the reasons why the senators are working on this case is to avoid the country getting terminal illnesses such as cancer, hypertension, etc. Some people do not realize that passive smoking is more dangerous than smoking and parent, who smokes in front of his child do not doubt about poisoning them by the fume. Russian Bureau Statistics revealed the information that passive smokers are more likely to develop lung cancer. In other words, a cigarette contains many toxic elements that are harmful to the physical and mental health of human beings.
People who have been smoking for twenty years, they do it more often. Productivity is the most important character of employees. In operation hours, smoking cigarettes takes a lot of time sometimes. Not many employers allow going for a smoke often instead of working because time is money. According to recent research by British scientists, frequent smoking reduces efficiency while labor and mental activity. This is why sports companies are not welcome to people who smoke not only rare but also at all.
In conclusion, smoking is a terrible habit that negatively affects well-being and decreases efficiency while working. Escape from tobacco means investment in oneself and prolonging life as much as possible.
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 81
- With a growing world population one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people Some people think that genetically modified foods offer a viable solution to this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Current situation with pollution is to dangerous to be managed by oridanry people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Today the internet has created that chance for ordinary people to become famous Is it a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18928571429 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62565832367 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0824678403 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.8125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260785578248 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077703073182 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885062528221 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152777014311 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496360065522 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.