Some people think that strict punishment for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accident. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
In this day and age, how to lessen road accident in the city is a hotly-debated topic that often divides opinion. While some say that applying rigorous castigation on offenders will be an effective move, I believe that highway safety can gain a betterment by other methods.
On the one hand, harsh chastisement is a form of deterrent for those who violate the traffic laws. Some strict rules which are seizing driving licenses, fining a large sum of money or even capturing sentences will provoke consciousness of citizens because they do not want to suffer those stringent punishment. Furthermore, drivers who have already punished by strict laws will afraid to repeat that again. After enduring the punishments, drivers will raise more carefulness and alertness as well as more understandings about road regulations.
On the other hand, I would argue that reducing automobile collisions can be tackled by other measures. First of all, if government just emphasizes on imposing strict rules, traffic fatalities can not be decreased effectively. There are two prominent causes involved with traffic injuries, which are drivers' high rate of using alcoholic drinks and substandard quality of highway, and government can take steps to improve these problems by introducing heavy taxes on alcoholic beverages and investing more on highway structures. On top of that, it is important to cultivate more understandings about traffic for teenagers. Ministry of Education and Training should insert one subject about traffic learning in the compulsory curriculum, which equips essential traffic knowledge for pupils in a young age. As a result, road fatalities can be declined significantly by these solutions.
In conclusion, although stern traffic laws can mitigate vehicular crashes, I personally think that other measures could be more efficient to deal with the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-13 | HuyenNhung | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... again. After enduring the punishments, drivers will raise more carefulness and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47079037801 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98008093352 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635738831615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1758986603 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.461538462 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288361671873 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913953349034 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493483566652 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160008104912 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293299031407 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.