Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

We see or hear the news related to road traffic accidents every day. Though some people support the idea that harsh punishments for driving offenses can play a prime role to decrease traffic accidents, some including me, believe that improving road safety will be more helpful.

First of all, we need to understand the reasons behind the traffic accidents. According to one report I read, most of the accidents occurred in my country are due to irresponsive driving or mistakes are done by the drivers. Most of the drivers engaged in the accidents have driving licenses, legal documents of the vehicle and even wearing the seat belt at the time of the accidents. It clearly implies that if the government imposes strict punishments or penalties for driving offenses like driving without a license & documents or driving after alcohol consumption will surely help to reduce a few accidents, however, the impact would not be so much.

On the other hand, the government can improve the safety standards such as maintaining roads, street lights, side roads, correct traffic signs, etc. This will be more useful to guide all the drivers. Most of the accidents happen during the night, therefore if we can add some extra safety measures like traffic lights, speed breakers, etc. then it will surely curb a large number of road accidents at night. Also, we have traffic & driving-related rules with punishments and penalties that we must follow. Therefore, in my opinion, additional safety measures can actually reduce traffic accidents.

In conclusion, I think focusing on the improvement of road safety instead of increasing the penalty amounts or harshing existing punishments would be a more effective suggestion.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...breakers, etc. then it will surely curb a large number of road accidents at night. Also, we have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20216606498 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74603437159 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1008478621 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.846153846 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336804398235 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109505747518 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687341850806 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213528299095 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461733163309 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.