Food is one of the most significant resources that keeps us alive, strong and healthy. Therefore, a considerable number of people believes that schools must provide classes about cooking and science of food to the students. Whereas another group of people thinks that it is waste of precious school time for youngs and they can learn more significant subjects which I agree with.
Firstly, being able to cook can save a lot of money for the people. If there is no one who can cook in the family ordering from restourants will be the only choice. When we consider that a normal person eats 3 times in a day, dozens of extra money would be spent on ordering food during the life period of one individual. Furthermore, being informed about the ingredients of different types of food will make students choose what they eat more consiciously. Correspondingly, they will select more healthier nourishment for their own life quality.
On the other hand, cooking is a ability than can be learned in the family by help of the parents or close relatives. Moreover, in the modern lifestyle which youngs spend less time with their family, cooking is a perfect activity that can boost family bonds. Therefore, time spent on cooking classes can be used for other essential skills and science that would be hard to learn with the family members.
To conclude, althoguh the science of food and cooking classes could have some benefits to the students, time spent on cooking can be utilised for more advantageous and educational subjects which will have certain benefits on future career progression and life quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...can save a lot of money for the people. If there is no one who can cook in the fam...
^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...usly. Correspondingly, they will select more healthier nourishment for their own life quality....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ality. On the other hand, cooking is a ability than can be learned in the fami...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94464944649 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6228558019 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546125461255 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7177449877 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185182432351 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725761412262 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527503340145 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121627776221 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410857219977 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.