Food is one of the most significant resources that keeps us alive, strong and healthy. Therefore, a considerable number of people believes that schools must provide classes about cooking and science of food to the students. Whereas another group of people thinks that it is waste of precious school time for youngs and they can learn more significant subjects which I agree with.
Firstly, being able to cook can save a lot of money for the people. If there is no one who can cook in the family, ordering from restaurants will be the only choice. When we consider that a normal person eats 3 times in a day, dozens of extra money would be spent on ordering food during the life period of one individual. Furthermore, being informed about the ingredients of different types of nutrition will make students choose what they consume more consciously. Correspondingly, they will select healthier nourishment for their own life quality.
On the other hand, cooking is an ability than can be learned in the family by help of the parents or close relatives. Moreover, in the modern lifestyle which youngs spend less time with their family, cooking is a perfect activity that can boost family bonds. Therefore, time spent on cooking classes can be used for other essential skills and science that would be challenging for students to learn with the family members. Furthermore, cooking will require a lot of extra equipment which will consume a great deal of school funding. Additionally, it will be a necessary requirement to keep students under a strict control during cooking classes because they can harm themselves with knifes or other sharp items.
To conclude, although the science of food and cooking classes could have some benefits to the students, time spent on cooking can be utilised for more advantageous and educational subjects which will have certain benefits on future career progression and life quality.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04716981132 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68990740275 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9002003251 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176591506834 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668489782407 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518725928269 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120146128491 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433534186076 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.