Some people think that teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree

It is often argued that teenagers should require to do voluntary community work which will help society and children in their careers. However, I completely disagree with this point of view because at this stage a child should give only focus to learn and develop their skills. This essay will discuss will multiple reasons for not forcing children to do unpaid works.

To begin with, pupils at the age of learning and going to schools have to meet their deadlines for their homework. So, they have a limited amount of time to study and enjoy their leisure time such as playing sports or indulging in any other extra-curricular activities. If they take time to do unrelated jobs in their free time, it would be unethical and will be treated as unfair for them. Moreover, teenagers are not physically strong for labor skills. For example, a child working in a factory with machinery-related work. It can be harmful to the company as well as to themselves. This kind of work may easily lead to accidents at workplaces. Finally, factory owners do not allow juveniles to work in such places and find experienced workers for their work.

Furthermore, community work will not provide any merits to adolescents. If a youngster will voluntarily work at the age of learning, they will become low-quality employees in the future. Hence, learning is the most effective way of generating a contemporary economy along with a well-educated workforce of workers that will result in a happy and healthy society.

To conclude, individuals should not hire child labor for their work because it will be impacted negatively on children and will not provide any benefits to the community.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, kind of, such as, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98928571429 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83107528068 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5953365059 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287832885505 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098062269803 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078685452504 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168862398303 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875135473725 0.056905535591 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.