A group of people suppose that the domestic authorities should implement stringent obligations about the amount of noise produced by a person due to the interference and distraction it causes to surrounding people. Enforcing this kind of policy could bring both benefits to working productivity and drawbacks to human freedom.
On the positive side, imposing strict policy on making noise might rapidly decrease the noise pollution at schools and workplaces, which then leverages the working and studying outcomes. That said, the decrease of intrusive sound made by a person means that the increase of sound quality and the more concentration another person might get to complete their tasks precisely. As a result, this person not only boost their productivity but also their working or studying quality which benefits himself as well as his organisation.
On the other side, another group of people may find it is extremely unreasonable because this policy can deprive them of freedom of speech. They will claim that they are constituting to the whole society, so making some noise is nothing serious or harmful, therefore, a fining fee level is unreliable. In other circumstances, the authorities could exploit the laws to profiteer from the obligation. For instance, in Vietnam, there is a law that fine noisy people in public places and that money can be a lucrative income for some of the Vietnamese security forces.
In conclusion, a severe policy about annoying people with noise might upgrade the studying and working environment but possibly enrage a group of people if it is not implemented approximately.
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honeybee
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five years period 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hat money can be a lucrative income for some of the Vietnamese security forces. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27799227799 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90924527231 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57528957529 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.1516713685 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.7 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257350407121 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873882049128 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545129290504 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143849557773 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365631509704 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.