Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree

Many people believe that human beings invested too many resources in protecting wild animals and birds. Personally, I certainly disagree with this notion because of the following reasons.
First and foremost, preserving wild animals is beneficial to balance ecosystem. As a result, the environment will remain in a stable condition which reduces extreme weather and global warming considerably. Thus, people can enjoy the fresh air and avoid some natural disasters from the protection. For example, according to a study about the linking between wild animals and weather in MIT University in 2015, they found that some countries such as Australia and Colombia had more diverse ecosystems and are less affected adversely by nature than others due to paying attention to conserving wild animals.
Furthermore, the numerous species of birds and animals are no longer living on the Earth owing to our negligence and careless attitude. They could have saved them if the public had taken proper measures for their safety. Therefore, the government of every country requires to protect some species which are now on the verge of disappearing. For instance, in China, pandas should have gone extinct, but thanks to the necessary investment to protect them, they have survived to this day.
To conclude, it is undeniable that conserving wild animals and birds is an important action today because it has many advantages to both humans and the environment like reducing weather extremes and the rate for extinct species. Hence, from my perspective, the given statement does not seem to be rational.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Many people believe that human beings in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion because of the following reasons. First and foremost, preserving wild anim...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g attention to conserving wild animals. Furthermore, the numerous species of bir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'protecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: protecting
...he government of every country requires to protect some species which are now on the verge...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them, they have survived to this day. To conclude, it is undeniable that conse...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3162055336 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71849420665 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6756243982 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253862736045 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806325093052 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934472369684 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15302048859 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914282446564 0.056905535591 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.