Some people think that universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
The issue of whether colleges education should have equal proportion of each genders in every subjects remains a source of controversy. Although some people believe that men and women should have the same education opportunities, I do not agree with this idea as such a strategy would bring two main drawbacks.
Having the same number of men and women on all degree course is simply unrealistic. Student numbers on any course should depend on the applications that the institution receives. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of males and females, it wouhd need enough application of each gender. In reality, many subjects are more popular with one gender than the other and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, since nursing courses tend to attract more female applicants as its characteristics, it would be extremely difficult to fill in these courses if fifty percent of the places needed are dedicated to males.
Another rationale against this policy that it would be unfair to base admission to tertiary education on gender. Instead, universities should continue to select the best candidates for each subjects according to their qualifications. In this way, both men and women have the same opportunities to study their favourite subjects, which encourages applicants to work hard in order to achieve higher grades at school and academic courses. This also correlates to the fact that there would be more qualified workers contributing to the prosperity and stability of the society. If a male student is the best candidate for a place on a course, it would be wrong to reject him for a female students with lower grades or less degrees. Meanwhile, the rejected ones might have better performances and even achieve scientific research successes.
In conclusion, the selection of unversity students should be based on merit as it would be both impractical and unreasonable to change the current selecting procedure into ones that based on genders.
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxi 67
- Some people believe that it is impossible to help everyone in need around the world. That is why governments should only focus on helping people of their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and r 84
- Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- According to a recent study the more time people use the Internet the less time they spend with real human beings Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world wide we should be concerned 91
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems.Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity of the society. If a male student is the best candidate for a place on a cour...
^^
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...uld be wrong to reject him for a female students with lower grades or less degrees. Mean...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 715, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun degrees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... a female students with lower grades or less degrees. Meanwhile, the rejected ones m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17737003058 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9000050146 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7323314602 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.928571429 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183093870979 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658216238577 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554170711832 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111489770489 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544328856906 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.