Some people think that using traditions as attractions for money-making will destroy our culture, but others think that there is nothing wrong with attracting tourists that way. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people opine that attaractions loses its cultural value when used for creating revenue. While others think that there are no other ways to hold the value of historical places today. I firmly believe that this way not only it would be saved from destruction but also will help to boost economy.
Tourism has become the most vital part of any nation's economy. To begin with, the revenue gained from tourists who comes to visit such places from different countries creates source of income for government. Thus, boosts countries overall economy. In addition, more funds mean authorities can invest more for the preservation of such historical sites. In this way not only cultural importance would remain intact but also information about one countries' culture can be shared with other cultures. In addition, tourism sector indirectly helps people by creating employment and source of income for individuals living nearby. Hotel industry as well as food industry located near such sites rely solely upon tourists hence it can be said that it helps people in many ways.
However, to some this may seem to have negative impact on historical traditions. Firstly, individuals tends to loss a respect and value of culture when it is used as money making sources. Also, tourists from other countries and local residents visiting such attractions tends to put a risk on damaging that property.Secondly, they lose their originality when they are modified by authorities by making it more appealing to attract more and more tourists. Although, such things can be overcomed if look well after also will not have much effect on damaging culture.
To sum up, there is always a risk of losing cultural value of particular historical sites when they are used for making money. However, it can be overcomed with efforts and also helps government in it preservation of properties by creating more funds.
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think that using traditions as attractions for money making will destroy our culture but others think that there is nothing wrong with attracting tourists that way Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l value when used for creating revenue. While others think that there are no other wa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...m has become the most vital part of any nations economy. To begin with, the revenue gai...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ture can be shared with other cultures. In addition, tourism sector indirectly hel...
^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...to put a risk on damaging that property.Secondly, they lose their originality when they ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in addition, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12258064516 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6614447658 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551612903226 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9255607688 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201436457211 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063672282999 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469058495242 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131656846861 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285276060179 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.