Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people image that a millennial should essential to do unpaid job helping people in the society. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of young people should required to unpaid work helping people in the community. First, government subsidies for job of people are believed to equalize job opportunities among young adolescents regardless of their background. This financial support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall challenge young people for their job they want working but also create one opportunities for poor people and poor students don’t have degree, instead can try jobs by doing unpaid work then the state can accept them work, this to mitigate their feelings of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, unpaid would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and experience human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once young people working is pay-free. First, offering young people free wage job is would likely correspond with a young people financial strain on a country. Generating no income from work pay and fees, young people could become over-reliant on the family budget or other people budget meaning that there would be less input to development financial young people and other importance infrastructure such as support financial their families and satisfy their life. Second, free payroll job to higher a millennial wouldn’t tempt many people those who are not talent people or show no interest in that job, thereby adding great workplace burdens for companies and enrollment staff and potential wasting time that there young people could have spent pursuing more suitable career paths. It, instead, would be a more financially viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted students.
This essay above was discussed both views advantages and disadvantages of both view. In my opinion, unpaid some job for young people have advantages outweigh disadvantages.
- Some people think that art such as painting and music does not directly improve quality of people s life so government should spend money on other areas To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Table The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 61
- The best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and poorest member To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one opportunity', 'an opportunity', or simply 'opportunities'?
Suggestion: one opportunity; an opportunity; opportunities
...r job they want working but also create one opportunities for poor people and poor students don’t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46260387812 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77263871033 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595567867036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.2936653354 49.4020404114 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7857142857 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45815426791 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175323235793 0.084324248473 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155463823543 0.0667982634062 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287741228289 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314407432913 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.