Nowadays, Education is a vital role in people ’s future and behavior and it always depends on students preferences. Some persons believe that youngster compulsory go for the higher education other than to do the low-level jobs to serve the people around us, However, others believe that the opposite way. I strongly recommend that students should opt the carrier based on their interest and preferences. Otherwise, this leads to a negative impact on society.
To begin with the first point, Many people give support to choose higher education to build better job carrier opportunities. Plenty of jobs are available after the better education all over the world. If the youngsters are passionate to any the professional courses, that automatically tends to good impact on society. Because many professionals are part of human welfare and hospitality of the society. For instance, Doctors are always part of the service. They are contributing their life to do the treatment for their patients. Thus high educated young people are good impact in development and human welfare in the country.
On other hands, some of the people are suggested that youngsters should go for low-level jobs like builders and car mechanics instead of choosing higher education. All kind of employees is required to do the jobs in our country for the development and all. Some people believe that, if the all the young people are choosing higher education, then they are demanding high paid salary jobs instead of low-level jobs, So the shortage of people to do the low-level jobs will reflect in coming years,
As per my opinion, carrier selection always depends on the youngster's interest and it automatically leads to better productivity in our society.
In conclusion, for better productivity, people select their carrier as per individual interest. People should encourage to serve society in all profession for the development of our country.
- Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc. to serve society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Essay topics: In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agre 73
- Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc. to serve society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc. to serve society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
... than to do the low-level jobs to serve the people around us, However, others believe that the oppos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...to do the treatment for their patients. Thus high educated young people are good imp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...fare in the country. On other hands, some of the people are suggested that youngsters sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elieve that, if the all the young people are choosing higher education, then they...
^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtage of people to do the low-level jobs will reflect in coming years, As per ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26129032258 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83831558848 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474193548387 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4369703372 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248256695532 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830361054741 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619332426709 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140181392559 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511769327522 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.