Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
There have been opposing views regarding the role of zoos. While some people criticize these facilities as a cruel treatment towards animals and call for the eradication of such settings, others consider zoos as helpful in wildlife protection. This essay will analyze both views and present my personal opinion.
On one hand, zoos are deemed cruel and unworthy of being sustained for several reasons. Forefront among these is the notion of unfairly removing animals from their natural habitats. Caged in confined spaces often associates with a sedentary lifestyle, which goes against the natural instincts of highly active animals such as horses or pumas. These creatures may suffer from not only declined physical health but also mental illnesses as a result. Human abuse of zoo animals also factors in zoos being boycotted. For instance, some zoos in Vietnam have been lambasted and closed down for mistreating animals, beating them into submission or leaving them malnourished due to the lack of food.
On the other hand, there are compelling reasons in support of the necessity of having zoos. To begin with, these facilities shelter endangered animals from influences that can hurt their already dwindling population. These threats may come from natural events such as forest fires, the appearance of a superior predator or human-caused changes such as deforestation and poaching. What is more, zoos can bridge a connection between wildlife and people. Revenues gained from public visits to these facilities can be utilized for a range of purposes such as improving the quality of the captive environment or funding research into breeding programs.
Taking both sets of arguments into consideration, I take the view that zoos play an important role in animal conservation as long as they are regularly invigilated to minimize mismanagement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | ashita | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | vudinhthuyornot36464 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | Johnysingg | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | n0air9x9 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | n0air9x9 | 84 | view |
- The figure shows the results of a survey of 1000 adolescents in five different countries. The participants were asked at what age they believed certain rights and responsibilities should be granted to young people 73
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 81
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... will analyze both views and present my personal opinion. On one hand, zoos are deemed cru...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, while, as for, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40549828179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76494170546 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635738831615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2732066025 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.866666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1940874742 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635144794548 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614500539675 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110749803432 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429066955132 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.