Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However,other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Talking about the function of zoos is always debatable. It is often argued that zoos are better to be closed since their performances are abusive. However, several people agree that zoos should remain in existence due to their crucial responsibilities to protect endangered animals. I partially agree up to a point that zoo presence is essential not only to protect but also to preserve animals which I will elaborate below.

To begin with, there are several issues related to zoos where animals get rough treatment both mentally and physically by the zookeeper. Due to physical abusement, zookeepers tend to push the animal in terms of attractions in which generates the animals fatigue. Furthermore, the zookeepers tend to ignore the animals necessity such as enough meals and suitable accommodation. For instance, Elephants at Ragunan Zoo seem to suffer mentally in captivity since the lack of both spaces and food supplies. As a result, animals are suffering ironically that can lead into their death. Therefore, the zoos are supposed to be close if their management is not being improved where many cruel cases to animals rampantly can create animals to be aggressive and unpredictable.

Shifting towards the second view, the existence of zoos is still essential to establish a new environment to prevent animal extinction. This is regarding the fact that myriad of endangered species lose their habitat. For instance, forest fires cause the loss of Orangutan habitat in Borneo Island which means that they will be homeless. Moreover, zoos are built to protect the species from the illegal hunter, especially for those rare animals. Therefore, the zoos carry serious responsibilities for the forthcoming animal offspring not only continuously maintaining but also preserving.

To conclude, the urgency of zoos function is still needed due to animal preservation and it is better to maintain the existence of zoos. This is as long as the people are taking care of species necessity seriously for the forthcoming era.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-03 ratunugraheni 73 view
2023-07-03 ratunugraheni 67 view
2023-07-03 ratunugraheni 73 view
2023-07-03 ratunugraheni 73 view
2023-07-03 ratunugraheni 67 view
Essays by user ratunugraheni :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...more, the zookeepers tend to ignore the animals necessity such as enough meals and suit...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t only continuously maintaining but also preserving. To conclude, the urgen...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sly maintaining but also preserving. To conclude, the urgency of zoos functio...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, for instance, such as, talking about, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30030959752 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91584003186 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541795665635 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9676873271 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.705882353 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304015452883 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967151461114 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571554926442 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186219396098 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546252583977 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.