The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The existence of science is obviously essential, from the contemporary to the modern era of civilization. Science will always be attached to human well-being to gain a better quality of life. This essay will explore the extent to which I agree with this assertion.
Undoubtedly, science has been instrumental in advancing the health sector, such as medicine and some practical heals. Back then in 2020 when Covid-19 pandemic occurred, science was the only thing that experts could explore to solve the plague. Some medical experts and stakeholders collaborated to develop vaccines and treatments for several diseases which not only extended life expectancy but also enhanced the overall human well-being. For instance, the rapid invention of Covid-19 vaccines highlighted the gigantic role of science to save the worldwide civilization from the endemics. However, the noticeable existence of Covid-19 vaccines are still quite popular even though the pandemic is a bit over.
Moreover, the rapid scientific innovations extend beyond healthcare to all the aspects of life. Reminiscing the worldwide technological improvement through the ages, science has revolutionized the other sectors such as communication, transportation, and education. These are effectively impacting the way we connect to the global communities. For instance, the outstanding technological advancement in this modern era is the cellular phone which has many features to talk with people in many countries. Furthermore, the improvements are equally the same for the education and transportation sector.
To conclude, science and people’s lives are naturally engaged to understand the whole world better. This is because science exists to be people's reference not only for the health sector but also impacting all aspects of life, such as education, transportation, and communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 67
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 73
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73285198556 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21487796283 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581227436823 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2143341559 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17914327535 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605760635143 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05946719968 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127023114048 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669401931368 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.