While some believe that zoos play an indispensable role in protecting wild animals, others argue that keeping these animals in such a simulated habitat is harmful to them. From my point of view, although some drawbacks could be seen, they are overshadowed by the benefits.
On the one hand, critics of zoos may have their justifications. First, animals are isolated from their natural habitats and confined in a limited space. Even the artificial environment cannot come close to matching the space, diversity, and freedom that animals can have in their natural habitats. In addition, these animals sometimes could be trained for entertaining purposes. Some authorities would argue that they do not abuse them and their actions aim to raise the fund in order to improve the quality of these animals. However, all these things can make captive animals suffer from physical and mental illnesses, which is related to their shorter life expectancy in comparison with their wild counterparts.
Nevertheless, these opponents might ignore the essential role of safari parks in wildlife protection. First, most animals in these places are on the brink of extinction. This is due to the increase in illegal trading or other threats such as habitat destruction or their predators. Moreover, one of the most important functions of safari parks is to promote international breeding programs. Evidently, in the wildlife environment, some of the rarest species have difficulty in finding mates and breeding. Therefore, by using modern medical technology, zoos can ensure both the birth rate and the immature survival rate of these animals.
In conclusion, although there may be some drawbacks such as making animals feel pain or stress, zoos have significant impacts on the conservation of animal species. Therefore, they should not be closed down.
- Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both of 84
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree 78
- As countries develop their populations tend to live individually or in small family units In your opinion what is this cause and what are the effects on society 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83135997121 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9405808671 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192668681868 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638253428361 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499826452484 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138336758612 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545209956574 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.