As long as a person lives in a society, everybody must have own financial budget. Someone looked at it out of obligation, while someone else took this principle as their hobby. It is also likely that the inevitable conduct of work in one place or a certain change of work place based on one's own capabilities is also determined by the worldview of humanity. This is definitely my opinion.
Regularly working in the same organization is certainly reliable and career advancement is based on labor productivity during the employee's career. In addition, various benefits are provided for highly experienced employees. And by this way we can have a permanent team. But on the minus side, engaging in a regular type of activity is detrimental to human health. It is more likely to cause inhibition of brain activity, leading to nervous system dysfunction.
And we can observe this many times in our life activities. This manifests itself in different ways mainly depending on the type of activity. It follows that proponents of a free lifestyle do not choose to work in this way. That is why they are in business based on their personal creativity and capabilities. Doing what you want has a positive effect on human psychology as well. However, not having a specific job destroys the material aspect in the first place. Funds may not always be the way we want them to be. Therefore, this type of activity can show positive results it people who know how to use risk effectively choose it. This is the main difference between these two activities.
Personally, I prefer the second type of activity. Through this, I will have the opportunity to test my skills in various fields and even work abroad.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ental to human health. It is more likely to cause inhibition of brain activity, l...
^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
...f activity can show positive results it people who know how to use risk effectively ch...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8724137931 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81420086633 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61724137931 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.059359947 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.65 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146367711861 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037059155911 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382765946462 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869446115898 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023467694375 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.