Some say music is as important as other subjects as school to promote learning in children life. Agree or disagree
Recently, the phenomenon of music at schools and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of music studies is highly beneficial, such issues is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that music development can be a plus, and I would analyze that through this article.
From a social standpoint, promoting learning methods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of learning outcomes, as well as compulsory subjects, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an amazing academic experience which found playing music is a confident building practice. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both school facilities and school curriculum apparently can be seen.
Within realm of art, music industry might increase the consequences of music celebrities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the role of this valuable skill could relate to this reality that the demerits of privatization pertain to school regulations. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of voluntary subjects is correlated negatively with learning disorders. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of music studies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of musical learning activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a music study prove the significance of promoting positive outlook on life, but also pinpoint school policy implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-10 | samiraniazi | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly, the phenomenon of music at schools and its corresponding impacts has sparke...
^^^^
Line 6, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the downside of voluntary subjects is correlated negatively with learning d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65151515152 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1846217807 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651515151515 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1888484617 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244461287465 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778239688009 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393480130688 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137634336833 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296015523465 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.