In many countries holding highly sophisticated methods to tackle serious crime rate in societies. In spite of their efforts, crimes are continue to develop in societies. I do believe that, we have to go a long way with other measures to eradicate crimes from our world.
First and foremost thing is that, nobody is born as criminals, but their living circumstances make them criminals. In other words, people become criminals when they failed to get fundamental requirements. To illustrate, many studies of media highlighted that, since the unemployment is the main reason behind increased crime rates, people try to solve this issue by doing crimes. If government creates plenty of job opportunities especially for the youngsters, the unemployment issue will be solved to a greater extent. Despite of crime fighting organizations, the better jobs would eradicate the much incidence of crime from many countries.
Although the government organizations do a lot to stop violence, it is often not possible because people sometimes do crimes for their personal deeds. For instance, Times of India, recently conducted a survey and found that, ill-informed people, less educated people or people with personal deeds are the one committing crimes. They also put forward some suggestions such as better education and living status would help to reduce the incidence of crime regardless of their revenge. Hence, holding a good position in society with good education and job are often give social status and they may afraid to do crimes because it spoil their social status.
To summarize this topic, I would like to emphasize that, it is not just the responsibility of the crime fighting organizations to eradicate crime from our civilized societies. Even though we have so many existing laws , it should be followed very strictly. As individuals we should ready to solve this issue with a collaborative efforts .
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollutions and housing problems To what extent do you agree to disagree with this statement 84
- Some say that TV commercials are useful and others are not Give your opinion 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
.... In spite of their efforts, crimes are continue to develop in societies. I do believe t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spoils'?
Suggestion: spoils
...they may afraid to do crimes because it spoil their social status. To summarize th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ven though we have so many existing laws , it should be followed very strictly. As...
^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... , it should be followed very strictly. As individuals we should ready to solve th...
^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effort'?
Suggestion: effort
...o solve this issue with a collaborative efforts .
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... this issue with a collaborative efforts .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, for instance, such as, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27540983607 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93106401252 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580327868852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2889021322 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0312060654234 0.244688304435 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0113659840083 0.084324248473 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0192490445887 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0189294352014 0.151304729494 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119366457898 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.