Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

As businesses become more competitive, every manager is trying to motivate their employee to put more effort into their job performance and the common way to do this is basing an employee’s salary On their rate of production and sales. I, however, do not agree that this method would be the best.

The performance of many workers can not simply quantified with the rate of sales or production. For example, my job as a statistician is to gather data, analyze and plan for future. None of which involves producing or selling products with a definite price tag. This renders misusing how much I have sold or produced is not possible for my company where I work. instead, the exact data, correct analyze, the performance of my planning, and the level of my manager satisfaction is help to decide how much successful I have been.

furthermore, there are some unexpected factors that affect on the performance of the workers. The current state of economy, unexpected political development, and extreme weather conditions all have significant impact of how much the employee sells sell or produce. Hurricane, for example, can easily devastate a farm and all its products without any of worker being responsible for any of damages or decrease in production rate. Therefore basing wages on how much sell or produce can demotivate workers in such cases.

In conclusion, I think deciding how much employees should earn solely on how much they sell or produce is unfair or impossible in most, if not all, Cases. instead employers should look at a more diverse set of performance indicators, including customer satisfaction or punctuality.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'quantify'
Suggestion: quantify
...formance of many workers can not simply quantified with the rate of sales or production. F...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
...t possible for my company where I work. instead, the exact data, correct analyze, the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ide how much successful I have been. furthermore, there are some unexpected factors that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... there are some unexpected factors that affect on the performance of the workers. The cur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...damages or decrease in production rate. Therefore basing wages on how much sell or produc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... In conclusion, I think deciding how much employees should earn solely on how muc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
... impossible in most, if not all, Cases. instead employers should look at a more diverse...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: instead,
... impossible in most, if not all, Cases. instead employers should look at a more diverse...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08888888889 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93360455162 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8648661917 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190809883422 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704722998726 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567937558678 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111272887491 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181266181696 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.