As many metropolitan areas are emerging in the modern era, people have a tendency to relocate from rural areas to urban ones. This has sparked a debate about the declining number of countryside residents. In my view, this trend shows both negative and positive developments for several reasons.
On the one hand, in terms of the positive effects of rural residents migrating to urban areas, individuals will have more opportunities to join the labor workforce, which is a scarce resource in cities. Particularly, since many skyscrapers are being constructed, there is a significant demand for heavy labor, which is in excess in the countryside. Moreover, the younger generation is nourishing their dreams, which can only occur and thrive in metropolitan conditions. For instance, since there is a huge demand for heavy-duty workers such as builders, the unemployed are provided with opportunities to earn a living, while young residents are able to pursue their ambitions in well-known enterprises or organizations.
On the other hand, due to the waves of immigration that have occurred over many decades, the reality of overpopulation is inevitable. Additionally, since a significant number of people are relocating to cities looking for better employment possibilities, vacancies for accommodations are now unavailable. Furthermore, traffic jams have always been an issue for city planners, so when more people are commuting, the situation will become more exacerbated. For example, workers who cannot afford rental flats due to the rising demand for accommodations may become homeless, which means they will have to stay under bridges, making urban aesthetics look dreadful in the eyes of tourists. Nevertheless, more people commuting leads to more carbon dioxide emissions. As a result, global warming will worsen.
In conclusion, I admit that city life offers more chances for employment and helps nourish the dreams of young people; however, the drawbacks are unsolvable issues that will persist for years, if not decades. Hence, it is crucial to maintain the population ratio between rural and urban areas appropriately.
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give 78
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on outdoor sports Why is it a positive or negative development 84
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... warming will worsen. In conclusion, I admit that city life offers more chance...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49544072948 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11662667799 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0916425751 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.533333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972113364132 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371668828023 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422849474032 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690222094741 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586255696695 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.