All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree

The prevailing mode of transportation relies heavily on fossil fuel-powered vehicles, prompting calls for regulation. Many experts advocate for electric cars as a viable alternative. In my view, I am thoroughly convinced by the concept, given the worsening state of global warming and its detrimental effects on our planet. Moreover, electric cars contribute significantly to preserving public health in various aspects of life.

Firstly, It is undeniable that global warming is altering our lives negatively day by day. A primary reason behind this could be car prices are gradually becoming more affordable for the residents. This means too many cars on the road will emit Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere and exacerbate the greenhouse effect, making the climate warmer and a host of issues such as ice melting, rising sea levels, air pollution, etc…For example, numerous studies have claimed that the global average temperature has been persistently soaring over a few decades. They stated that the extent of ice melting at the South and North poles correlates with the level of heat absorbed during the survey period.

On the other hand, Electric cars contribute to safeguarding public health. Since electric cars do not emit any toxic gases into the air. They reduce a significant number of patients with respiratory ailments. additionally, electric cars generate less noise than conventional vehicles so resulting in reduced noise pollution, which significantly benefits people who are suffering from auditory disorders or noise-related insomnia. For instance, since the adaptation of electric vehicles in Danang three months ago. Statistics have shown a significant decrease in lung cancer patients admitted to the Oncology department. This addresses the benefits of electric vehicles on residents’ longevity.

In conclusion, I admit that overhauling the entire transportation system could be a daunting task. However, the benefits it offers outweigh the drawbacks as it not only puts a halt to global warming but also improves people’s living standards specifically their well-being states.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
..., rising sea levels, air pollution, etc…For example, numerous studies have claimed ...
^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ntribute to safeguarding public health. Since electric cars do not emit any toxic gas...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
... of patients with respiratory ailments. additionally, electric cars generate less noise than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ts admitted to the Oncology department. This addresses the benefits of electric vehi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63322884013 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03213399086 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667711598746 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5102044645 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.705882353 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167818878241 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555656381157 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522443487061 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932180165982 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043171021983 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.