Recently, there has been a significant discussion among young people whether a gap year before work is beneficial or not. Different point of views with regard to these have been argueing. Whilst some individuals are defending that travelling year to widen their horizon, others are asserting that this gap before work life is only expensive choice which result in lost of time. In spite of these assertions, there is a fact that it can not be rejected that the benefits resulted from the gap year outweights the drawbacks.
At the first glance, even though individuals revealing the disadvantages of the gap period seems to have strong argument, on the closer examine the fact seen obviously indicates that the travelling year procures to individuals more great merits than its detriments. Since an individual can not gain things that they learn when travel around the world at the work within a year. However, they can easily gain skills which they obtain a work year after travellling year as a person having widen perspective. Indeed, as the most famous Persian writer Mevlana said that person which travel a lot knows more than other one that only lives.
On the other hand involving dissimilar dimension regarding advantages and disadvantages of the gap year, there is a different important debates with divergent aspects. While some young men are defending that people should have a relaxing year after college owing to distinct fact that this year is an opportunity in front of people to listen themselves and to ameliorate their pyscological circumstances. Howover, others are contending violently that this period is definitely waste of time and money because people can earn more money through work. Although these two opinions have some acceptable aspects, there is a noteworthy reality that even a creative point of view have much more values than millions of money. Indeed, after seeing various places and getting know more stories about them, beginnig with memory and look which is develeped by the year gives individuals many merits that they never get through work.
To sum up, since an opinion which can create new things is more valuable than money, the arguments defending a gap year is detrimental are not strong than the other assertions emphasized a gap time.
- Weekly earnings of full time graduate employees by type of degree and age 69
- In some countries, some people think that women should have equality with men, in particular equal rights to work as police officers or serve in the army. Others think women are not suitable for such jobs. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... more great merits than its detriments. Since an individual can not gain things that ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'debate'?
Suggestion: debate
...ap year, there is a different important debates with divergent aspects. While some you...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, regarding, so, while, in spite of, to sum up, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10933333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62132655136 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0534433866 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349896803163 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126045978079 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698727022375 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220134268432 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651685493384 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.