Space exploration is a controversial topic. Some people believe that resources should be invested in exploring space, while others argue that this money could be better spent on more pressing problems on Earth, such as poverty and climate change. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, the question of whether nations should allocate budgets to research on other planets has become a controversial topic. While some have argued that this investment is valuable, others hold the thought that it is better to spend money on more urgent issues. Both points of view have rational reasons which will be elaborated on in this essay but I agree with the latter assertion.
On the one hand, there are good grounds to argue that findings from space investigation could bring significant benefits in terms of human life and the economy. First and foremost, it might open a promising new environment for people in case life on Earth goes extinct in the future. Indeed, since the Earth’s habitat in recent years has become more and more hostile with detrimental climate change threatening human life, looking for a new planet to inhabit may be an effective solution worth considering. In addition, should research on outer planets be conducted, valuable minerals, such as gold, titanium, and so on with high economic value might be discovered. As a result, instead of exploiting Earth’s natural resources, people can take advantage of other sources in space to serve the economy.
On the other hand, I believe national authorities should prioritize other more pressing problems, especially poverty alleviation and addressing climate change. Firstly, in most developing and undeveloped countries, it is indisputable that the government cannot help all citizens have a good quality of life let alone spend money on space research. For instance, in Africa, it has been witnessed that a huge number of people cannot access basic needs for life and education so budgets should be used to deal with this problem. Secondly, decades have shown that global climate change has impacted negatively on the Earth’s life while finding a new planet to live on is not an easy task but costs a fortune and takes a lot of time. Therefore, to solve this problem immediately, the government should implement policies to heal Earth such as investing in alternative energy sources and planting trees.
In conclusion, although research in the universe comes up with certain benefits, it only should be invested by wealthy nations while national money should be used for other important issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people work from home using modern technology today Some people think that only the workers benefits from this and not employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that the newspaper is the best way to learn about news while others believe that a more effective way is through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether nations should allocate budgets to rese...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19407008086 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72370867346 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574123989218 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4289067721 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.642857143 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371930863268 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116751772308 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492585052192 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22027371058 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309384999468 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.