Due to the development of science, scientist want to know all of things in the world. It is included of within entire earth and outer space as well. This kind of curiosity leads them to explore what happening in space. However, the research will spend much money. If I were the government of the authority who making the decision, I would like to allocate the money to solve more complicated problems.
It is useful to wider explore the space. It can bring advantages for the sciences, for example, we can know which planet despite earth that can be human’s home. Nevertheless, many crucial problems in this world are still occuring. For instance the poverty. The money that can be used for outer space research can provide the employment for society. It can be spent for education as well. Government can reinfrastructure the school, university, laboratorium, etc, to fulfill the needs of appropriate facilities. I can be used for improve the road that has not yet provided in rural areas for making the access easily used by citizens.
Related to the problems that happening in this world, it might be wiser for government to prioritize the prominent things that urgently must be solved. Personally speaking, these problems are the most crucial problems that can bring impact directly to the nation. It will harm civilian if the problem will not be solved. In health and medicine aspect, for instance. There are many diseases do not have the medicine to cure. It possibly better to allocate the fund for exploring space onto the research for finding the medicine. The incidende of chronic diseases will be reduced or eradicated by knowing the suitable medicine and treatment.
In sumarise, exploration of outer space is not a crucial thinks to do. Government might be setting up and spending the fund for space onto other problems that still happening in world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
... have the medicine to cure. It possibly better to allocate the fund for exploring spac...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dicated by knowing the suitable medicine and treatment. In sumarise, explorati...
^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...rise, exploration of outer space is not a crucial thinks to do. Government might be setti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, as for, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98089171975 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72109484854 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509554140127 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.628506787 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0909090909 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2727272727 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160287271678 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575986120277 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496593758244 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11749662881 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300838464302 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.