Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent?
What is your viewpoint on this issue? Give reasons for your answer.
There is no doubt that research and experiment in space require high expenditure/ huge monetary investment. Pouring money into space exploration for finding a new place to live is quite justifiable. However, problems such as poverty and improper utilization of resources must be taken into consideration by a country, which cannot be overlooked at any cost.
Space exploration is the only way of finding another inhabitable place for humans to live. The reason for this is that Mother Nature has reached on its threshold as all the natural resources are coming to an end. Therefore, with the help of money, it becomes easy for space explorers or scientists to reach out to the alternative places to live. Mars, for example, is said to be the next habitat of humans and it is only possible when vast amount of money will be spent on it. Moreover, it also helps to spot / identify the incoming dangers from space. To be more specific, space stations, which are very expensive to build, warn scientists about incoming dangers such as asteroids which may collide with earth and could create havoc/ destruction. However, I believe that money can be better utilized for other urgent problems. One of the problems is endless poverty. Millions of people die every year because of scarcity of food. The financial resources spent on space research can be spent to provide food to the needy. For example, in South Africa, thousands of people die because of hunger. The money utilized on space research by developed countries like USA must be used for this major concern. Additionally, there are debates on shelling out this much amount rather than making rules on the judicious utilization of natural resources. Reckless use of resources is one of the main cause degradation of Earth. Thus, governments and international organizations should put forward this issue on their main agenda rather than space exploration.
In conclusion, despite the fact that space exploration is the need of the hour, other grave matters such as destitution and injudicious use of natural resources cannot be neglected and money could be used on solving these problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07932011331 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77016112387 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558073654391 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8594746235 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3684210526 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365458257043 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105689154286 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804011170038 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228827676591 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810434735035 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.