Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development
Recent decades have witnessed an increase in space tourism, raising many questions of safety from many scientists worldwide. Although the advantages could be pronounced, they are outweighed by the downsides in discernible ways.
On the one hand, there are a multitude of reasons why space travel could be fraught with pitfalls. First, there is a correlation between space tourism and prohibitive capital investments in researching and developing many advanced space technologies. For example, manufacturing a single spaceship could cost government agencies and private space corporations billions of dollar, let alone disbursements on the spaceship maintenance. Second, Space travel could put tourists’ health in jeopardy due to the discrepancies in atmospheres. It is implied that if tourists unfortunately decouple with the main space station, they will suffer from suffocation as the air gradually leaks out and subsequently their body will be conducive to explosion stemming from pressure imbalance.
On the other hand, Extraterrestrial tourism could bestow net positive benefits. First, Space tourism proceeds would contribute to an increase in national revenues. This means higher degree of monetary investments in other public sectors like healthcare or infrastructure improvement, promoting citizens’ overall living standards. In addition, Space industry generates job opportunities for many professional scientists. This suggests that if extraterrestrial travel is prohibited, many space experts will be made redundant.
In conclusion, I recommend against space tourism due to its substantial impacts regarding costly investments and health impairments. Official authorities and private space companies should only subsidize projects developing technologies for space exploration instead of tourism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-03 | aamna sharma | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to broadcast foreign films and TV show. Others,however think it is best to produce local films and shows. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 84
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree? 86
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens 49
- Developing countries need financial help from international organizations > 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24110671937 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38387016042 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656126482213 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6191775835 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297951290746 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107766613581 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055910554405 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179746950361 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530292423472 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.62 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.