In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case ? what can be done about this problem?
In all over the world, people who are starving still can be found even though the agriculture is improved. I believe that this phenomenon is occurred because the advances of agriculture field has not evenly distributed to all areas in this world. This essay will explain the root cause and its countermeasures to solve this issue.
In refer to this problem, I assume that the main reason is because the development which has been made is only focus on accessible areas. In addition, the poor infrastructure in some other areas is one of the obstacles to spread the agriculture improvements. For example, many countries in Africa are still hard to reach because they are surrounded by desert which consist of wild animals. Hence, it must be needed more effort and cost to spread the development to this kind of area.
Referring to the root cause, government support in each country can have strong role to solve the issue. Firstly, government should aware that the improvement in agriculture should be aligned with the enhancement of infrastructure. Secondly, the focus area should be widen so the improvement can be adapted in many land’s condition. Thirdly, each country can collaborate in bilateral agreement to exchange their agricultural experts. Moreover, the spread of advances made in agriculture in all areas can decrease the number of starving issue.
In conclusion, I believe that hungry people still exist in this world because the rise of agriculture developments is not followed by its balance supply. Hence, in my opinion, government from all nations should make some movements to support the agriculture developments spread.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 73
- Nowadays, more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 87
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 56
- The bar chart below show the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'widened'?
Suggestion: widened
...ure. Secondly, the focus area should be widen so the improvement can be adapted in ma...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2030075188 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97359628398 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533834586466 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.9300538503 49.4020404114 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240977741373 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876895056349 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602590987187 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153258443559 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637655784848 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.