Agriculture has developed remarkably recently thanks to the development of technology. However, there are numerous people in significant areas still have to suffer from starving due to several reasons which can be tackled.
There are some motives that cause a lack of food. Firstly, people living in regions which are affected severely by natural disasters such as floods, droughts, thunderstorms, earthquakes and the like cannot have the opportunities to develop their agricultural industry. For example, in areas which are covered by deserts, crops and vegetables cannot be planted normally; therefore, citizens there still go hungry due to the detriment of nature. Secondly, there are numerous conflicts happened among nomads or regions like religious conflicts, political conflicts, civil wars, and the like. As a result, people have to move to other places to find peace, which also results in food shortage and land for farming.
However, the problem can be resolved with several solutions. In terms of food shortage due to the severe nature, governments can prepare food aids in advance. Canned food, dried meat of fruits, fresh water and the like are extremely necessary for people who are suffering from the consequences of natural disasters. In fact, people in the middle of Vietnam are prone to several tremendous floods yearly, which destroy thousands of plants and animals as well. However, authorities have provided them with food aids in order to help them survive and set up their lives again. Additionally, from the disagreements’ perspective, governments should be responsible for the peaceful situation of those sensitive areas by enact legislation to mitigate conflicts or fights among people. Only by doing so can people feel safe to settle down and focus on producing food to get over poverty and hunger.
In conclusion, there are several reasons which lead to the fact that there are still people do not have enough food in some regions worldwide; however, the problem can be eliminated by the care of governments and other people. We should join hand to help each other who are in adversities since we are all living together in this world.
- The chart shows the global water use by sector and water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000. 78
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26724137931 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82591969159 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548850574713 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8022744939 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5625 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138076548628 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472806077478 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430976778875 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958685815652 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034209720031 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.