Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely considered that speaking is more powerful than writing. Although this notion is easy to understand because spoken communication tends to show the expression of the speaker more clearly, in my opinion, I firmly disagree with this perspective and believe that written communication has more intensive powers.
On the one hand, speaking could provide with plenty of effects through the speakers’ expressions. A speaker can raise people’s motivations and feelings after presenting a wise, fluent, forceful speech. However, words are but wind, these effects could also be temporary because the audiences could forget all the words right after the dialogue. For instance, nowadays many people listen to TED Talks videos with enthusiastic speakers and interesting speeches but there was a survey showed that 76% of them cannot actually follow the ideas of those speakers to put theories into practice in daily life. In addition, speakers who speak with their expressions are likely to forget to follow the previous plans of their speeches so that they cannot demonstrate their full ideas from the first place.
On the other hand, written communication might be prioritized over the spoken one’s. The written format might require skillful writers to illustrate the context in a precise way. Essays, materials, or many writing platforms can attract people with a huge number of figures of speech such as simile, metaphor, or alliteration, which sometimes are too formal to include in spoken contexts. These figures can make people comprehend the ideas and the beauty of words. Furthermore, while verbal communication can create momentary impressions, people can have more intense emotions and understandings with written communication. In fact, after reading a book, we might tend to have deeper thoughts and take time to truly understand all the notions that were given. From that point, written works and materials might result in powerful and profound thoughts of the readers.
To conclude, it is often argued that verbal communication has a more vital role in daily life than written platforms. On the opposing side, I firmly believe that written communication might have more powerful influences on people due to numerous of skills and the depth of mind that it requires.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a precise way" with adverb for "precise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...llful writers to illustrate the context in a precise way. Essays, materials, or many writing pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36565096953 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80256578271 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567867036011 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9423204575 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232663336715 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836845771779 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093637611329 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18839302927 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125398700856 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.