There is an opinion claimed that students can be taken knowledge from their mistresses than other sources. To a certain extent I agree that lectures are extremely vital guiders in each student’s life; however I also believe that pupils can broaden their horizons from several media.
Firstly, it can not be denied that studying with teachers brings back plenty of merits. Since people merely were tiny children at kindergartens until they become under-graduates, there are always schoolteachers who assist them to accumulate comprehension. Obviously, no one can learn by his way without teacher’s instruction as they are predecessors who have an in depth intelligence, they know how to learn effectively because of having experienced previously. If a student seems not to have an understanding, they will give a helping hand to him and together tackle problems. This is advantageous for students now that not only they can learn added information but also do they gain a number of practical solving-problem skills which is needed for their futures.
Moreover, when being taught by well-qualified professors, tutees tend to have a logical routine for studying. For instance, some lazy graduates said enthusiastically that they were grateful with their assistants owing to the fact that they always reminded them of doing homework, supported meticulously, which made them more motivated and better.
On the other hand, it is not usually necessary to have teacher’s guides, juniors also studying themselves by another sources such as internet or useful webs. The reason for it is that there are a huge number of documents on the Internet, which are contributed diversely by people entire the world including element scientist, experts and ones who have detailed knowledge. This can be a quite dependable authority to get them to make out. The more excited pupils feel about it, the more they want to explore. It is also a way for them to help themselves become self-reliant. It is a part and parcel method being applied in almost universities, there, alumnus must elaborate lessons on the contrary have less announcement from lectures. The information absorbed directly is easily comprehended than tedious sermons in classes, besides, teaching full knowledge in class spends numerous time as scholars can give them basic, which is not enough for them to know inside. Subsequently, learning with lecturers is likely to make scholars more passive. Due to the fact they merely look forward their supervisors, whenever they give any origin, teenagers take in it in dimly way. Actually, it is difficult for them to be had ability to manage complex and predicted issues.
To sum up, learning by any sources has both advantages and challenges. Instead, undergraduates should have blended learning and apply it appropriately to improve their qualification and capacity.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views a 89
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 78
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 89
- In many countries the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more violent Why do you think this is the case and what can be done about it 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 455.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30989010989 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04518481963 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591208791209 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 750.6 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6364943282 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.047619048 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19610698322 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057867692616 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494374059133 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116195600888 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314094740357 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.