The question of whether juniors can learn more from their professors than from other sources is a hot topic these days. In my opinion, despite the fact that the internet has made it possible for individuals to effortlessly access an infinite quantity of knowledge, instructors continue to play an important role in students' learning. This article will demonstrate how important lecturers are for scholars' learning.
For starters, students may study a wealth of credible knowledge from their supervisors. Mentors, it appears, are professionally educated to lead undergraduates through their study. They not only have academic knowledge, but they also understand different students' needs and talents in order to provide the most effective methods of educating them If appentices solely educate themselves through online training, they will have difficulty digesting what they heard and saw since there is too much knowledge to classify and pick. As a result, without teachers, students have no idea when and how to begin. In other words, teachers always manage to provide learners with intriguing and significant lectures, ensuring that students learn from correct and relevant knowledge. As a result, the productivity of their learning could be greatly increased.
Furthermore, instructors may assist undergraduates in developing crucial soft skills in addition to studying. Juniors may communicate with their tutors and classmates while attending face-to-face sessions, giving them the opportunity to develop their communication skills.For example, if they have any questions or answers, they would boldly approach instructors and dispute with peers in order to communicate their views. Furthermore, helpers teach students how to be decent citizens. Moral teachings are given to students in order for them to behave well toward others. Mentors also teach children how to live an optimistic life and how to overcome adversity. As a result, academics can gradually develop to enter life, which distinguishes dons from computers or televisions.
To summarize, there is no question that technology may be educational; yet, the job of supervisors is not substituted. Only until it is passed down by lecturers does the ocean of philosophy become truly accessible to students.
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six main subjects at a US university in 2010 73
- Do you like to eat out or eat at home
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 89
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether juniors can learn more from their profe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...y to develop their communication skills.For example, if they have any questions or ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60755813953 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04673213963 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610465116279 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.2583630801 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.470588235 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175203604839 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050653642777 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561493936951 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916284303579 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604035719621 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.