In recent years, education globalization has become prevalent; hence a load of learning tools have been invented for undergraduates that aid seniors in studying. However, numerous people argued that scholars could study better with lecturers than other sources. In my opinion, acquiring knowledge from supervisors is useful information, but absorbing from advanced technology brings several merits for learners. And I will demonstrate my opinion in this essay.
There are umpteen compelling reasons why graduates should learn far more from professors than from other sources. Firstly, dons that are equipped with advanced knowledge about the major. All of them are professionally trained, have high qualifications as well as equipped with the necessary skills in teaching. Therefore, it is an immense opportunity for learners to approach academics correctly, fully. In contrast, by learning from other sources such as the internet, television, apprentices might get into complicated issues. For instance, there is sundry useless, incorrect information or misinformation. This leads to sophomores might not distinguish what is valuable knowledge for themselves or could learn misinformation from various resources. Besides, tutors also are instructors, the best buddies, who assist, guide pupils in the academic path. Mistakes are prominent in the studying process and supervisors can help them by correcting their mistakes and pointing out false problems in studying. Consequently, teachers play an integral part in knowledge transmission.
On the other hand, studying from advanced tools brings several advantages for students. In Contrast to traditional learning, the internet helps students approach a vast amount of information that does not exist in books. This can aid seniors to expand their knowledge and get more information in the entire world irrespective of geographical distance. Moreover, this method could motivate students to give up the passive form of learning in the class instead of the active style. In the long run, it might cultivate students to be proactive in their life and also in learning, which assists learners in easily adapting to sociable life.
In conclusion, I believe that it is better if students could mix the traditional method with learning from helpful resources. Pondering far more with educators is one of the best sources of knowledge and other sources could bring undergraduates several benefits.
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, in contrast to, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.689373297 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04550007691 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58038147139 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5213207514 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4761904762 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0952380952 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227908671068 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609296386465 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565558191923 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148452723235 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579769899251 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.