In the age of technology, accessing knowledge wired has been easier, for this reason, they have become an indispensable part of education. Thereby, a load of people, especially students and their parents, argue whether students learn far more with their teachers than other sources such as the internet or television or not. From my perspective, I suppose that students can learn a lot from the internet and TV set but I am also in favor of educators being still relevant in the modern age. I will demonstrate my view of point in this essay.
To begin with, it can not be unquestionable that studying with schoolteachers brings back multiple assets. Lecturers are predecessors who have in-depth intelligence, subsequently, they know how to grasp effectively and have a logical routine for studying. For instance, several idle graduates enthusiastically state that they were thankful to their helpers because they always reminded them of doing homework, supported them meticulously, which made them more motivated and better. Not only do they have academic experiences, but they also realize distinctive students' needs and capabilities to give the most effective methods of teaching them. Apprentices, who solely educate themselves through online training, may get trouble digesting what they heard and saw as there is too much information to classify and select. Henceforth, without professors, they impossibly make sense of when and how to start. In other words, mistresses always manage to give intriguing and profound lessons to learners, which ensures that trainers learn from accurate and useful savoir-faire. Furthermore, educators can help undergraduates cultivate momentous soft skills besides studying. While attending face-to-face classes, juniors may interact with their tutors and classmates, which brings them a chance to develop their interpersonal communication. To illustrate, if they have any questions or answers, they will boldly ask professors and dispute with friends to express their opinions. Likewise, assistants instruct learners how to become decent citizens. Apprentices are taught moral lessons to behave well to others. Mentors also inspire them about the optimistic life and the route to overcoming adversity. Accordingly, scholars can step by step mature to enter life, which ‘’virtual teachers’’ like the internet can teach them.
On the other hand, it is not frequently radical to have supervisors' guides, juniors can study themselves by other sources such as the internet or privileged webs. The reason for it is that there are a huge number of documents on the Internet, which are contributed diversely by people entire the world including element scientists, experts, and ones who have detailed knowledge. This can be a quite trustworthy authority to get them to figure out. The more excited seniors feel about it, the more they want to trace. It is also a way for them to help themselves become self-reliant. It is a part and parcel method being applied in almost universities, there, alumnus must elaborate lessons, on the contrary, have less announcement from lectures. The information absorbed directly is more easily comprehended than tedious sermons in classes, besides, teaching full understanding in class spends numerous time as scholars can provide them basic, which is not enough for them to know inside. Subsequently, learning with lecturers is likely to render scholars more passive. As they merely look forward to their supervisors, whenever they grant any origin, teenagers take in it in a dimly way. Actually, it is tough for them to be had the ability to manage intricate and predicted issues.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that technology can be educative, on the contrary, the role of supervisors is not replaced. The ocean of philosophy may be really accessible to undergraduates only when it is handed down by lecturers.
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 78
- Some people say that traffic accidents are caused by the increasing number of motorbikes Others blame for man s fault Which point of view do you agree 89
- Do you like to eat out or eat at home
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1177, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dimly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('way') instead of another adjective.
...ant any origin, teenagers take in it in a dimly way. Actually, it is tough for them to be h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, likewise, look, may, really, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 24.0651302605 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3298.0 1615.20841683 204% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 609.0 315.596192385 193% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41543513957 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.20363070211 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05984521025 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 343.0 176.041082164 195% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1021.5 506.74238477 202% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 16.0721442886 187% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.831540952 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 8.67935871743 253% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206464301602 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488175626965 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888756149185 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131642548707 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10278965051 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 189.0 78.4519038076 241% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1177, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dimly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('way') instead of another adjective.
...ant any origin, teenagers take in it in a dimly way. Actually, it is tough for them to be h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, likewise, look, may, really, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 24.0651302605 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3298.0 1615.20841683 204% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 609.0 315.596192385 193% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41543513957 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.20363070211 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05984521025 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 343.0 176.041082164 195% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1021.5 506.74238477 202% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 16.0721442886 187% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.831540952 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 8.67935871743 253% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206464301602 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488175626965 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888756149185 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131642548707 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10278965051 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 189.0 78.4519038076 241% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.