Whether juniors can acquire more knowledge from their teachers than other sources or not is a considerable argument these days. From my perspective, although the breakthrough of the internet makes people easily approach an unlimited amount of information, professors still play a crucial part in students' learning. This essay will illustrate how essential lecturers are for the studying of scholars.
First, learners can study a great deal of reliable knowledge from their supervisors. Apparently, mentors are trained professionally to guide undergraduates through their learning. Not only do they have academic experiences, but they also realize distinctive students' needs and capabilities to give the most effective methods of teaching them. Provide that appentices only educate themselves by training through internet, they will get trouble in absorbing what they heard and saw due to the fact there is too much information to classify and select. As a result, without teachers, they impossibly make sense of when and how to start. In other words, teachers always manage to give interesting and profound lessons to learners, which ensures that pupils learn from accurate and useful knowledge. Hence, the productivity of their learning could be improved a lot.
What's more, educators can help undergraduates cultivate critical soft skills besides studying. While attending face-to-face classes, juniors may interact with their tutors and classmates, which makes them have a chance to practice their communication. For instance, if they have any questions or answers, they will confidently ask professors and argue with friends to express their opinions. Moreover, assistants instruct learners how to become good citizens. Pupils are taught moral lessons to behave well to others. Mentors also inspire them about the optimistic life and the route to get over hardship. Therefore, scholars can step by step mature to enter life, which makes dons various from computers or televisions.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that technology can be educative, on the contrary the role of supervisors is not replaced. The ocean of philosophy may be really accessible to undergraduates only when it is handed down by lecturers.
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that a gap year between school and university is a good idea while others disagree strongly Consider both sides of this debate and present your own opinion 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 61
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ir learning could be improved a lot. Whats more, educators can help undergraduates...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55294117647 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98963607742 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.513739674 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3684210526 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0526315789 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176508073985 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446755034144 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526495773388 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942619049008 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608642093951 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.