It is believed that international sporting occasions such as the Olympic Games or World Cup play a vital role in pacifying pent-up stresses and evoking patriotic feelings among individuals. Personally, I cannot demur that sporting events can be essential but in a handful of cases, they fuel further disputes and cause serious repercussions that deteriorate international harmony.
There are several reasons why international athletic events also provide safe ways to express a sense of nationalism. For example, with a view to backing up the athletes who represent their countries, football supporters frequently wear clothes with national colors and hold flags. Furthermore, global games play a pivotal role in relieving constant global tensions. Perhaps the primary rationale is that they are a testament to worldwide inclusivity and togetherness. All residents regardless of age, gender, and identity can be enamored with sports, therefore, it will create a golden chance for individuals to connect with like-minded people and understand cultural, social, and religious differences. Henceforth, sports can pave the way to world peace and unity.
On the flip side, numerous individuals believe the fact that the race to victory among various nations could lead to squabbles and one-upmanship. It is evident that through sporting games, a nation can prove its supremacy over other nations, hence, the playground may turn into a battlefield where people are maddened with intense emotion to the point of erupting into violence and bearing animosities towards their rivals instead of acting as a stress-buster. These popular may turn into bitter experiences ruining global relationships and contradicting the values of sports themselves. Moreover, I suppose that patriotism, in common parlance, is it is the love for the country that lies in the consciousness of the citizens, it is not merely abrupt feelings that fade away right after the end of the match.
In conclusion, these occasions are the epitome of togetherness, and develop mutual understanding but also cause vulgar nationalism.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.565625 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10832896978 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6375 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6903113888 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182554993212 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573348540554 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612767920744 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996925854587 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707062623435 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.