Students in a school should learn academic subjects and pass exams. Other skills such as cookery, dressmaking, and woodwork learnt well from family and friends do you agree or disagree.
In this modern era, all the schools follow the same patterns in the academic years, which is to teach students about the subject and take exams. While some people think that besides academic subjects students learn other skills such as cooking, dressmaking and woodwork from their close ones, other people not agree with them. This essay will discuss a reason for both aspects of the statement, all the explanations described in the following paragraphs.
To embarks with, learning other skills such as cooking, craft and fashion related, which very beneficial for students, which will be more helpful for them in the long run. If schools start to teach these types of skills to their children in extra lectures, students become more independent. The University of Gujarat in India for example started providing free classes of cooking, fashion and wooden arts on their campus in 2019. Since after taking these steps in their university, all students took part in various classes because it will be helpful. Therefore, these types of evidence prove that despite learning new skills in schools and universities, students become a more independent and better person ever than before.
On the other hand, the number of people who agree with the statement that skills related to cooking, crafting and costume making is not reached by teachers in the classes, students learn from their loved ones like their families and friends. Because schools only teach subjects like math, science and more, they do not have any time for other activities. For instance, a result of a survey in 79 universities and institutions from all around the world found that over 89% of students agreed that they learned skills, which were not teaching in rooms by their relatives. Indeed, schools and classes designed for academic courses, not for skills, which is a reason for people who think that skills learn from families not in the class.
To conclude, although no matter where everyone learns skills from schools or families, skills play vital roles in the long run. If schools started to teach skills such as cookery, dressmaking and woodwork on their campus, it will no doubt creates a number of positive impacts on the lives of pupils in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-05 | rajpatel90 | 77 | view |
- Mobile phones have made life easier any one can Use a mobile phone to make answer work calls and home calls from any place 7 days of a week do you think this development has more positive effects or negative effects on the individual or society 84
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 61
- Nowadays it is easy to apply for and be given a credit card However some people experience problems when they are not able to pay the debt back 56
- Most of the world s problems are caused by overpopulation Do you agree or disagree 56
- The maps shows changes in frenton city during 1992 to 2012 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...lasses, students learn from their loved ones like their families and friends. Becaus...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04582210243 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40559355725 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506738544474 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.2397773947 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.714285714 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283178008594 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107778686459 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751067408859 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191528615477 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517638144784 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.