Studies Show That Criminals Get Low Level Of Education. Some People Believe That The Best Way To Reduce The Crime Is Educating People In Prison So They Can Get A Job After Leaving Prison. To What Extent Do You Agree Or Disagree?
People have different views about educating offenders in jail to deter crime and they make earnings after being released from prison. To a certain extent I agree that provide education and vocational training is necessary for criminals. However, I also believe that education is not the best solution to reduce crime.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why criminals should be imprisoned. Firstly, prison is the punishment for crime against society. Offenders who commit serious crimes such as robbery or murder might face life imprisonment. They must learn that, if they break the law, they will get punished for their bad behaviors. Secondly, people are fearful of offenders, therefore offenders should be kept in jail. If dangerous offenders are not imprisoned, that would be very dangerous for citizens. Furthermore, it could raise the people’s awareness in order not to resort to criminal practice.
By contrast, I accept that education for prisoners may give to the reduction of the crime rate. The primary reason is that such a form of education could provide offenders with the working skills that are essential when they return to the community and help them integrate into society easily. Also, vocational training is the solid foundation for criminals to change their future. Moreover, education prevents them to re-offend another crime after being released from prison. Prison education also breaks down racial and ethnic barriers that are often a cause of tension and violence in prisons, improves significantly relations between staff members and the incarcerated, and dramatically enhances the prisoners’ self-esteem.
For the above reasons, I believe that rehabilitation programs are not the best way to cut down lawbreakers, but it still the good way to raise the people’s awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-28 | kamalena | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42105263158 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89584455148 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1221944352 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269685980436 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871509523294 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540739133768 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171678963277 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535203852745 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.