Studies suggest that children spend more time watching TV than they did in the past and spend less on doing active or creative things. Why do you think it is the case? What measures and methods can be used to tackle with it?
It is generally accepted that television is one of the most preferable forms of entertainment for all ages. Some people claim that children are more addicted to watch televisions rather than create new things. This essay will discuss some possible reasons why this issue has occurred and provide the measures for this disturbing trend.
One prominent factor contribute to this trend would be televisions’ attraction. In other words, many programs aired on TV have interesting and thought-provoking contents which fascinate children’s attention a lot. Typically cartoons with funny characters and catchy-tune musics, children are likely to collapse in front of the TV screen for hours without boring. In particular, if children concentrate for an extended time span without breaks in whether adequate and educational content or not, it can be harmful to their eyes as well as brain. Another feasible explanation can be attributed to the lack of parental care. To make it clearer, for many reasons, parents tend to have little time to spend with their children. Hence, these kids would make friends with the screen instead of receiving any encouragements from their parents to foster their imaginative or creative ability. Gradually, children would get absorbed in TV programs and isolated from the outside world.
The discernible solutions of this trend embrace parental control and school support. First, parents must soon prevent their children from developing this bad habit. That is to say, not only should parents strictly limit their children’s screen time, they also need to be role models because young children will need more proper guidance. Second, school plays a crucial part in children education. To put it simply, it should be better if school give more chance for students to participate in doing active or creative things with their fellows. For instance, painting, puzzle or sports contests are interesting activities which stimulate children’s creativity or imagination effectively. Children are likely to have interest in these things and the time they spend in front TV could be limited.
In conclusion, the essay have explored two primary causes why children prefer watching television to doing active or creative things and two measures to address this issue.
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Studies suggest that children spend more time watching TV than they did in the past and spend less on doing active or creative things. Why do you think it is the case? What measures and methods can be used to tackle with it? 84
- Parents should not pressure their children to choose particular profession Young people should have the freedom to choose path they like To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- For school children, their teachers have more influences in their intelligence and social development than their parents.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Typically,
...cinate children's attention a lot. Typically cartoons with funny characters and catc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'parent'
Suggestion: parent
... habit. That is to say, not only should parents strictly limit their children's sc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4469273743 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92614398002 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9523163578 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.631578947 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247492314174 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751644421556 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560809566534 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151425156992 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413702061567 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.