Athletes are model role to modern society of unique physique, patience and outstanding performance. While some feel that their earnings are adequate their performance, I strongly agree with those who believe that other professions should be more recognised.
On the one hand, it could be argued that sportsmen having just a short carrier. Their performance has a high impact to their body parts, such as knees, joints etc. Those in favour to argue that should consider that many other manually dependant profession, like a carpenters and labours expose their body to high resistance power almost every day as well. Also, some people think that athletes are a prime example of health life-style to youth as well as adults. Although many publicly known sportspersons have been found guilty of taking illegal substances to boost their endurance. Therefore, I believe that some sportsmen are not a good role model to society.
However, I side with those who believe that money made just from sport activities are extremely high and other professions have to be paid way better. It is fact that athletes are just entertaining people on TV or at stadiums. People are actually not involved into their performance and not making any physical activity, however, mainly consuming junk food and alcohol. Although, highly qualified personnels, such as physicians, advocates have to study for undoubtedly long time to gain a degree. Moreover, their studies do not finish after graduation as with continuously developing technologies they have to maintain their knowledge and skill up-to-date. However, perhaps my strongest argument for unfair payment to other professional agains sportsmen is that life-saving profession such as paramedics, firemen or police officers daily risk their lives in spite to save others. These so called “heroes” enter place from where other people running away. It is not a secret that majority of emergency personnels stay at their position due to their passion, not because of the salary.
In short, although sportsmen have relative short carrier, some other professions demeaned extensive length of study, followed by future studies. Therefore, on balance, I believe that life-saving professionals deserve way better pay than sportsmen.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
- Some people think that it is more important to build new houses than to plant trees. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010. 73
- Internet contains a lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... life-style to youth as well as adults. Although many publicly known sportspersons have ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces to boost their endurance. Therefore, I believe that some sportsmen are not a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in short, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45042492918 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87877801698 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617563739377 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1366493031 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145400656712 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446070530859 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432289300749 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897655214948 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124906822809 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.