In recent years, the problem of local museums are not frequented by local people has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend can be attributed to a host of reasons, some solutions should be taken to encourage local people to visit these sites.
There are a number of reasons why the local communities show no interest in museums or heritage sites. First, since the region's historical relics have become so familiar to the locals, they are no longer inlined to explore more. In fact, natives or students have been conveyed about historical information, such as war or war relics, through schools or mass media, such as television, radio, thus discouraging them from learning more about these places. Second, by recognizing that the existence of historical museums is always located in the vicinity near the place of living, the locals will procrastinate the visit. This means that they are not aware of the importance of visits to historical sites, which takes them for granted, sad but true.
Nevertheless, there are also some feasible solutions to attract more local people to pay a visit museums and historical locations. First, in order to provide more opportunities for student to learn about local museums, schools can organize regular educational trips to these places. In fact, compulsory trips will help students learn about their own nation's culture and history, thus enhancing their awareness of national cultural values. Second, if the government organize more entertainment activities and events with the assistance of technology inside museum's campus, the number of indigenous people visiting museums will increase. For example, local museums can be upgraded with modern designs based on the development of cutting-edge technology such as touch screens or multi-space effects, which triggers people’s curiosity and interest.
In conclusion, the familiarity of locals with their own culture and environment makes it difficult to promote and attract many indigenous people to visit their local museums. However, by organizing more interesting activities and compulsory trips, the government can make the situation better.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46726190476 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80964834016 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.997157319 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.214285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415247625386 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148711129817 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935528554738 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266603093991 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533852751331 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46726190476 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80964834016 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.997157319 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.214285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415247625386 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148711129817 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935528554738 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266603093991 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533852751331 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.