Thanks to advances in technology, the ways people communicate have revolutionized. In this essay, I tend to explore the impacts of the latest gadgets on people's relationship, however, in my opinion, the drawbacks of technology-oriented relationships often outweigh the benefits.
It is an undeniable fact that over the past few decades, the typical ways of communication have hosted profound changes. Traditionally, social relationships used to be limited to face to face interactions. It was by no means possible to make comfortable and noise-free contact with people in remote areas. However, in recent years, state-of-the-art technologies have provided an opportunity that enables people to communicate with their loved ones overseas. For instance, online social media applications such as Imo and Whatsapp have provided high-quality voice call and video call, alike.
It worth mentioning that deploying an innovative device to excess could bring about severe consequences. Firstly, alienation has become relevant to modern families. If family members spend their pastime at home keeping stuck in social media, weakening bonds of households will be inevitable. Secondly, either addiction to online social media or inappropriate materials, such as violation or pornography, affect the youths frequently. According to a recently published study, the majority of teens are incredibly excellent on online communicating, though they often experience anxiety and lack of confidence in direct communicating.
overall, the changes stemming from modern technologies have facilitated the way we communicate, it would be better if educational programs are implemented by authorities to raise people's awareness regarding the negative impacts of misuse.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Is it more important to be able to work alone or with group of people on a team or to work independently! Use reasons and specific example to support your choice 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...social relationships used to be limited to face to face interactions. It was by no means possib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... people to communicate with their loved ones overseas. For instance, online social m...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
... confidence in direct communicating. overall, the changes stemming from modern techn...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92885375494 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43571263284 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691699604743 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6502560819 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.384615385 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18934779104 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613206920047 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577446624765 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119946220445 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068350297047 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.