Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Such is the technology revolution, particularly the Internet that the human interaction has changed significantly. Though the new type of communication has several disadvantages, I believe that its benefits outweigh those drawbacks.
It is an inevitable fact that the technology has made dramatic influence on the way people communicate with each other. Firstly, with the help of the Internet, there is a shift from letters to texts or mails. Precisely, in the early times, people used to keep in touch with each other by exchanging letters, however, within a few seconds for a text or a mail being transferred, they can receive a message from others. Moreover, people nowadays do not have to hangout to face-to-face talking, as they are able to see each other via video call or Skype. An additional factor is that the social network which enable people to make friends, to share their stories or to communicate with their friends.
Nevertheless, the effect of the technology on human relationship has been the controversial issue recently. On the one hand, some people argue that the new relationship has become negative development which has led to the lack of real interaction. Technology addicts, for instance, are always checking their phones, texting, chatting, surfing the websites while hanging out with their friends and hardly say a word. In the other hand, a large number of people believe that the development of technology has provided them numerous benefits. If it is not for the invention of texts and mails, they would not have saved their time in writing letters, sending them to the post office and waiting for response. Thus, by far the greatest advantages of the Internet is that it helps people who do not have a chance to meet each other to face talking. As an example, abroad students are capable of seeing and talking to their parents via Skype and this encourages them from being homesick.
In conclusion, the technology has changed the way in which people interact with each other. There are convincing arguments both for and against this new type of relationship, however, I think that this has become a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-27 | danhvinh126 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | mrn | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-20 | Rijana | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-11 | mary.ssherr | view | |
| 2019-07-15 | vaishali saral | 67 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answer and in 89
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends.Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 93
- Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 92
- Task 1: You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d hardly say a word. In the other hand, a large number of people believe that the development of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04481792717 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85691491374 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532212885154 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0621639766 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332229885849 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111810650763 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939863514877 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223864409482 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1219738718 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.