TASK 2: People say that reading for pleasure helps people to develop imagination and better language skills than watch TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, many people claim that reading helps them to boost imagination and other skills rather than watching TV. While reading text bring beneficial to us, I believe that watching TV also include various advantages.
On the one hand, people chose reading as leisure activity in their spare time for several reasons. Firstly, when one reads the whole text pf daily news or magazine, they have to brainstorm to transparent the reading text. This process results in imagination skills. Secondly, an article or a tabloid not only present in mother tongue but also they could be translated into other languages. That means readers can get deeper understand about new words or new phrases throughout the text. Foe instance, VN express which is the most common online news website provide readers with mainly two languages Vietnamese and English in order to help their readers improve English leve; while reading their interest articles.
On the other hand, while reading provide readers an opportunity to acquire complex skills, their opponent, watching TV give their audience ability to imaginative and linguistic. Watching TV programs like documentary films, quiz game shows, etc require players and followers a limited time to think about the answer for sophisticated questions. When you focus on finding out the appropriate answer, your brain could indulge in numerous fields to look for the right choice. This process led to ability to be imaginative. Furthermore, several TV programs was presented in 3 to 4 languages by multilingual speakers. It is the functional way for audiences to hear different languages at the same time in the correct way. According to VOL Learning Language Channel, the founders want to create a channel on YouTube with main purpose is help followers learn new foreign languages while listening their favourite songs.
In conclusion, if reading the text help readers improve their skills to some extent, watching TV will give a worthy chance for audiences to acquire imagination and language skills
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to read'.
Suggestion: to read
...ges. On the one hand, people chose reading as leisure activity in their spare time...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...native. Furthermore, several TV programs was presented in 3 to 4 languages by mul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31384615385 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66764794569 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609230769231 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3140446526 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266120784666 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852365894626 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837272817474 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199537765021 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738118706835 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.