Task 2: in some countries, some criminal trials in law courts are shown on the television for the public.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Ongoing contentions over broadcast preliminaries compare indicated focal points—instruction about legal procedure, rebuilding the confidence of the public on the judicial system, and crime prevention—against potential impediments such as increasing prejudice and worsening embarrassments against the respondents.
Allowing cameras into court would enable victims of crime to see justice being done, and the public’s suspicions that “something is spoiled behind those shut entryways” could be diminished. Also, televised court hearings educate the public on the trial procedures, thereby making them aware of the dos and don'ts inside the room. Moreover, the audience is made aware of the legal remedies available in case they would be caught in the same scenario. Another significant impact that it could bring is the reduction of crime rates. Having potential lawbreakers witness the possible torment of reputation they could suffer from for committing crimes, could persuade them not to commit any.
On the contrary, having trials aired on public television might also increase the public's prejudgment of defendants. In a democratic society, an accused is considered innocent until proven guilty; however, having the public watch trials without understanding how the system really works puts the respondents to a disadvantage. The public will surely start airing their comments and opinions on social media upon viewing, even if the trial is still ongoing. This will then lead to tragic embarrassment of the accused. Even if they prove themselves innocent, the humiliations will leave scars.
Albeit no experimental research has been led to testing either speculation, episodic proof—worried about news seeing inspiration and consideration, news review and maintenance, and TV's capacity in forming open observations and general suppositions—can be utilized to gauge the contentions. In my opinion, the laws of the countries and the rules of their courts should weigh which cases may be shown for the education of the public. They should make sure that airing such would not disturb public order and put national security at risk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-05 | clarkkent159 | 89 | view |
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Students learn more from their school teachers than from other sources such as the internet or television To what extent you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Nowadays, many animal species are becoming extinct. Some people believe that countries and individuals must solve this problem, others believe that humans beings are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Task 2 Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes of this problem Suggest solutions 84
- Today people are surrounded by all kinds of advertising. This affects what people think is important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...blic television might also increase the publics prejudgment of defendants. In a democra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, then, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73831775701 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28751519174 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.8031771125 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135773826664 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465785504917 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053877629659 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722507829371 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031170516117 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.